New Cases – High Court of Australia…… — 30 Nov 2008

.footertext { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:10px; color:#666666; padding:00px 5px 0px 5px; } .footerlink { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:10px; color:#666666; text-decoration:underline; } a, p, td, body, .article_key, .article_value{ font-size:12px; } .summary{ width:580px; } a { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#333333; text-decoration:underline; } h2 { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:12px; color:#666666; font-weight:bold; padding:5px 5px 0px 5px; } h3 { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:12px; color:#C41731; font-weight:bold; padding:5px 5px 0px 5px; } .mytags { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:12px; color:#C41731; font-weight:bold; } .title { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:12px; color:#666666; font-weight:bold; padding:5px 5px 0px 5px; } .subtitle { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:12px; color:#000000; font-weight:bold; padding:5px 5px 0px 5px; } .subtitle2 { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:12px; color:#666666; font-weight:bold; padding:5px 5px 0px 5px; } .subbody { padding:0px 10px 0px 10px; } .alertsbody { border-style:solid; border-color:#CCCCCC; border-width:thin; padding:5px 5px 5px 5px; } .citation { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:12px; color:#C41731; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; } .highlighted { background-color:#FFFFAA; } .articletitle { margin-bottom:-10px; margin-top:-2px; } p, b { color:#666666; } .summary{ background-image: none; width: 620px; max-width: auto; padding-bottom: 15px; border: none; border-bottom:1px solid #D2D1D1; } .date_indent{ margin-left:12px; color:#666666; } –>

 – Supreme Court of Appeal, VIC – Supreme Court of Appeal

Victoria

Supreme Court of Appeal

  • [2008] VSCA 235 – R v Nguyen & Ors (28 November 2008)

  • [No topic]

    Victoria

    Supreme Court of Appeal

    R v Nguyen & Ors [2008] VSCA 235 (28 November 2008)

    Catchwords
    CRIMINAL LAW – Appeal – Sentencing – Co-offenders with various roles in syndicate trafficking large commercial quantity of heroin – Whether mitigatory factors including delay, guilty pleas, remorse, depression, separation of parent from child appropriately weighed – Application of parity principle.

    Advertisements

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

    w

    Connecting to %s


    %d bloggers like this: